The correct answer is D) None of the above. Considering the range of opinions on virtually every aspect of parenting, there is no commonly agreed conventional wisdom.
That is why is so difficult t come up with one aspect to be considered part of the conventional wisdom regarding proper parenting that has withstood the test of time.
It all depends on the parent's background, culture, customs, and family tradition. For one culture, conventional wisdom can be one thing, while for another culture can be completely the opposite.
The traditional way to raise children for the American family is completely different from the way Mexican families raise children. If we compare these two with the way Japanese families raise their children, is very different.
So traditions vary according to the way families have been educated in different parts of the world.
Answer:True
Explanation:one need to be able to lead themselves first which may mean they need to know who they are , where they are going and what is it that they real want and they also need to have their own values that they live by.
After one is successful in leading oneself they need to have skills and appreciate the need to improve their leadership skills in order to be able to lead the team towards the right direction.
When all of these above has been effectively acquired one then need to ensure they understand how they need to lead the organisation and what they need to be able to do that efficiently.
All of these need to be in one's mind throughout the leadership journey .
Answer:
c. tolerance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various professionals, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of tolerance. This happens when a toxin is introduced to the body various times, the body begins to develop a sort of immunity to that toxin and is able to tolerate it without having the same effects like before.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
This is known as the Stare decisis. This is the basis for
the doctrine of the precedent in which the previous court cases and their
decisions serve as the basis for the future ones. Stare decisis means to stand by
the things decided and the courts issue it when there is a known case and a
known ruling for the issue in question.
The answer is b he is present in abstract form