Answer:
Rivercity Coffee Shop
Chad cannot sue Jose. The $10,000 is paid to Jose is a bribe. Since a bribe is not legal, it cannot form the basis for an enforceable contract.
Moreover, the offer by Chad is an antitrust and anti-competition consideration that is legally frowned upon. illegal contract
Explanation:
For a contract to be enforceable, it cannot be illegal. A bribe is illegal. The basis for the contract is illegal. Therefore, Chad cannot sue Jose. Since Jose decided to breach the contract, neither Chad nor Jose is entitled to any compensation. Jose cannot be held liable for non-performance.
Answer:
=> fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 0.4482 = 44.82%.
=> fraction to equity = 0.5518 = 55.18%.
Explanation:
So, in this question or problem we are given the following parameters or data or information which are; that the utility function is U = E(r) – 0.5 × Aσ2 and the risk-aversion coefficient is A = 4.4.
The fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills and its equivalent fraction to equity can be calculated by using the formula below;
The first step is to determine or Calculate the value of fraction to equity.
Hence, the fraction to equity = risk premium/(market standard deviation)^2 - risk aversion.
= 8.10% ÷ [(20.48%)^2 × 3.5 = 0.5518.
Therefore, the value for fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 1 - fraction to equity = 1 - 0.5518 =0.4482 .
Answer:
$11,009
Explanation:
Calculation to determine The amount due on the maturity date
Amount due =10900 x .06 x 1/6 = $109 + $ 10900
Amount due=$11,009
Therefore The amount due on the maturity date is $11,009
Answer:
return on investment
Explanation:
At the time of calculating the markup that used for the formula of cost plus pricing many companies would base the markup on the target return on investment as the return on investment considered the net operating income as it takes after considering all the other type of cost
Therefore as per the given situation the first option is correct