Answer:
in 4 days i will delete brainly warn to friends b btw
Explanation:
Answer: Cause or no cause took place
Explanation: There are various steps taken to determine whether there is reasonable cause (evidence exists that workplace discrimination occurred) between employees took place. The EEOC will investigate this situation by applying the following procedures:
1. The EEOC investigator will request that the charging party and the organisation provide information on the situation. The investigator will then go through this info and make a recommendation on if reasonable cause does exist.
2. If the EEOC investigator determines that reasonable cause exists, then this investigator will issue a letter of determination stating this fact, to all parties involved. All the parties including the investigator will then discuss how to resolve this charge through a process known as conciliation.
3. If however it is determined that reasonable cause for workplace discrimination did not take place, then the investigator will issue the charging party and the organisation with a dismissal and notice of rights document. This document stipulates that the charging party has 90 days to file a lawsuit in federal court if he/she decides to take further action against the organisation.
Answer:
1)Celia actually did charge $3,000 on her credit card and admitted such to the credit card company, but argued she only had $2,500 in her bank account to pay off the credit card.
Telling a bank or a credit card company that you do not have enough money top pay right now will not make them forgive the unpaid balance. They might offer you some type of agreement or schedule for you to pay for the remaining balance (in this case $500). A court will never rule in favor of a borrower just because they do not want to pay the whole balance and will not accept a payment schedule.
3) Celia and the credit card company agreed that Celia would pay $2,500 as full payment of the disputed debt, but Celia never paid the $2,500.
When Celia and the credit card company reached an agreement to settle their dispute, that agreement is binding on both parties. Celia must pay the $2,500 and the credit card company will not charge any more money. But if Celia doesn't make the payment, she is not performing her part and the credit card company can sue her for it, and will probably win.
Explanation:
the options are missing:
- Celia actually did charge $3,000 on her credit card and admitted such to the credit card company, but argued she only had $2,500 in her bank account to pay off the credit card.
- Celia actually did charge $3,000 on her credit card and admitted such to the credit card company. However, Celia had no money, so she offered the credit card company her car in exchange for full payment of the debt and the credit card company accepted. Celia turned over title to her car to the credit card company.
- Celia and the credit card company agreed that Celia would pay $2,500 as full payment of the disputed debt, but Celia never paid the $2,500.
- Celia believed she did not charge anything on her credit card during her trip to Las Vegas. The credit card company claims she charged $3,000 to the card while in Las Vegas.
<span>That is "True".</span>
<span>As vital as
the Web has been in the consumer market (B2C), it has turned out to be
considerably more imperative in the business-to-business (B2B) advertise. E-commerce
is the action of working on the Web or online. It alludes to purchasing and
offering items and services on the Web through a site. E-commerce stands for
electronic commerce.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
Disability buyout insurance is the term which is defined or designed in order to provide the funds that is important to buy an owner or the interest of the partner in the small business if the person become disabled.
It will help or allow the remaining owners to continue the operations by replacing a key person in terms of financially as the disability of the person prevents them from returning to the business.
