Answer:
higher than net income computed under variable costing when units produced are greater than units sold
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing techniques are used to compute the accounting cost of various operation. The calculation procedures of both the techniques are different; that is why the results are different. The net income under absorption costing is higher because it takes into account the indirect expenses and indirect costs. Likewise, absorption costing technique also includes manufacturing or overhead cost.
Either because they filled it to the limit and haven't paid it off or it's swipe not chip. Also if you're in a different state than where you registered the card you have to call your bank and let them know your out of state
Answer:
Higher unemployment, lower wage share of output, and higher Gini coefficient in the long run.
Explanation:
Since less labor will be used, total unemployment will increase. Besides less labor being used, more capital will be used, so the share of labor in total output will decrease. Labor efficiency increases, since you need less labor to produce the same or even a larger amount of output.
New technologies tend to increase the wages of high skilled labor and management. Since the Gini coefficient measures income inequality, then higher wages for a few will increase inequality.
This is an example of what is happening in the US, where highly trained labor is getting paid better every time while unskilled labor is getting paid the same as many years ago or their wage has even decreased with time. This shows how important a college education is, and the difference will only keep increasing.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": The estimated fair value of the options.
Explanation:
Employee Stock Options or ESOs are equity compensations given be firms typically to high-range executives. The company provides the workers with call options so employees can purchase the derivatives at a certain price and time. These types of compensations are useful as motivations for the employees to help them perform better in their duties.
Answer:
$380
Explanation:
Ziva's total cost of farming is composed of two different costs: explicit and implicit costs.
Explicit cost is an out-of-pocket cost that a person incurs to carry out a particular business activity. It is sort of, a business-related expense for which the business pays. In Ziva's case, it is $130, the cost of the seeds
Implicit costs are opportunity costs. An opportunity cost refers the benefits an individual, investor or business misses out on when opting for one alternative in preference of another. In our case, it amounts to $250($25*10 hours)
Thus, Ziva's cost of farming
= $130 +( $25*10) = $130 +$250 = $380
