1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
san4es73 [151]
3 years ago
8

In ancient Rome, involvement in politics was an unpaid opportunity. Why, then, were some people able to get involved in politics

?. The wealthy had time to engage in politics, since they did not have to worry about money. . One person from every family had to participate in politics, as required by law. . It was socially unacceptable to stay out of the political process. . Certain hours of the day were set aside for political issues and processes. .
History
2 answers:
Kipish [7]3 years ago
7 0

To answer then given problem, it would be because the wealthy had time to engage in politics, since they did not have to worry about money. The correct answer between all the choices given is the first choice or letter A. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

yanalaym [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The wealthy had time to engage in politics, since they did not have to worry about money.

Explanation:

In Ancient Rome, involvement in politics did not represent a paid job the way it does now. Instead, being a politician was voluntary, and this meant that not a lot of people could be involved in politics. In fact, in practice, this meant that only the very wealthy could afford to take the time to participate in politics, as they did not need to worry about money.

You might be interested in
What was Commodore Perry’s significant contribution to the beginning of Japan’s transformation?
mixer [17]
Your answer is he opened Japan to the west.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help like ASAP, does anyone know what this cartoon means?
Anni [7]

Answer:

i think it means D.? i dont know im sorry.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What made the work of the artisans important?
vovangra [49]

Answer:

i think is c

Explanation:

its the only one that really makes since

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer the following questions about internal and external factors that led to change in various states after 1900.
ladessa [460]

a) Identify factors that led to the Russian Revolution (1917).

The October Revolution in Russia in 1917 signified the collapse of Tsarist Russia and the establishment of a regime by the Bolsheviks and the leader of the Communist Party, Lenin. The main reason, among others, was the dissatisfaction of peasants and workers due to large class differences. The dissatisfaction of workers and peasants was preceded by several wars that Russia led and lost all, but the war with Turkey. Peasants barely survived in unreformed economic agricultural conditions. Workers fought for bigger rights in factories, for shortening working hours, but primacy was in waging wars, rather than dealing with economic issues and dissatisfaction of workers and peasants. Also, Emperor Nicholas spent more time dealing with his own family than on state issues. All this led to the general dissatisfaction of the people and the October Revolution.

b) Identify factors that led to the Mexican Revolution (1910–17).

Some of the factors that led to the Mexican Revolution were the dictatorship-like way of ruling that Porfirio Diaz exhibited for over 30 years, the exploitation and poor treatment of laborers, and the large disparity between rich and poor. While there is no definite cause for the Mexican Revolution, there were many factors that led to the decision to rebel against the government.

c) Explain how land-based and maritime empires gave way to new states in the 20th century.

The land-based and maritime empires gave way to new states in the 20th century when the older, land-based empires such as the Ottoman empire, the Russian empire, and the Qing empire collapsed due to a combination of internal and external factors. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define moral diplomacy
Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Moral diplomacy is the system in which support is given only to countries whose moral beliefs are analogous to that of the nation. This promotes the growth of the nation's ideals and damages nations with different ideologies.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS!!! :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • how did the fugitive slave act and the kansas nebraska act increase tendions between the north and south
    14·1 answer
  • In economics, businesses do all except which of the following?
    5·1 answer
  • Match the descriptions with each form of British rule.
    5·2 answers
  • 17. Why did Lincoln need a military victory before he could announce the emancipation of slaves in southern states? A. The North
    8·1 answer
  • Examine the terms below. Write a sentence explaining what the terms have in common a. indentured b debtor?
    13·1 answer
  • the Jewish belief in a single god was significant because: A: it divided the Jewish people based on language and culture, B: it
    11·1 answer
  • How did the alliance system in Europe contribute to the start of World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements BEST
    15·1 answer
  • What did the United States have that made it so successful during the second dustrial revolution?
    10·1 answer
  • what is wrong with me...why do none of my relationships go right? why doesn't anyone want to date me? and then when i get a bf a
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!