Answer:
The Jerry's adjusted basis in his partnership interest at the end of the year is $45,500
Explanation:
The adjusted basis of Jerry in his partnership is shown below:
= Partnership interest - Ordinary loss + long term capital gain + dividend - non deductible expense + cash contribution - share reduction
= $50,000 -$15,000 + $3,000 + $2,000 - $500 + $10,000 -$4,000
= $45,500
The ordinary loss, share reduction, and non deductible expense would decrease the Jerry interest in partnership firm while all other cost would increase his interest. That's why the amount is added and subtracted.
Hence, the Jerry's adjusted basis in his partnership interest at the end of the year is $45,500
Answer:
$13.34
Explanation:
For computing the today price, first we have to determine the present value of equity which is shown below:
The Present value of equity = Spending amount on dividends and repurchases ÷ equity cost of capital
= $9.4 million ÷ 13.3%
= $70,676,691
Now the share price equals to
= Present value of equity ÷ outstanding shares
= $70,676,691 ÷ 5.3 million shares
= $13.34
Answer:
Cruz Company
Indicating whether to (a) record a liability, (b) disclose in notes, or (c) have no disclosure.
Transaction Remark
1. Guarantee of supplier's debt (c) have no disclosure
2. Damages for disgruntled employee (b) disclose in notes
Explanation:
When it is not probable that the supplier whose debt is guaranteed by Cruz will default on the debt, there is no need to make a disclosure since probable liability is not accruing to Cruz. But with the legal case of a disgruntled employee, Cruz should disclose the information in a note. It can only be recorded as a liability when the amount of the damages can be reasonably estimated.
Sorry i hope this a little helpful i think that you divide
Owns can legally do so under the first amendment. Therefore, it's true.
<h3>What is first amendment?</h3>
It should be noted that first amendment states that the Congress makes no law representing and establishment of religion.
In this case, if Owen refused to testify on the premise that the information he would divulge would self-incriminate him, he can legally do so under the first amendment.
Learn more about first amendment on:
brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ11
