1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mestny [16]
3 years ago
10

Families as a whole tend to resist change and strive to preserve what is normal. True or false?

Social Studies
1 answer:
svet-max [94.6K]3 years ago
3 0
First of all, it's not exactly clear what is "normal" - this changes from generation to generation and for example the traditional family used to be considered "normal" but now all other kinds of families are normal too.

Second, there is typically a big generational difference between family members, so it's hard to say that they function "as  a whole"

For these reasons I don't think this statement is true. 
You might be interested in
Which of the following reformers outlined the social gospel in a book entitled Christianity and the social crisis?
White raven [17]

Correct answer choice is :

B) Walter Rauschenbusch

Explanation:

During the history of the Christian religion, there have been various beliefs of Jesus and his redeeming work. In fact, one man once said that no person, no church, no age of story has ever understood the full scope of God’s saving plans in Jesus Christ. That man was Walter Rauschenbusch, born on October 4, 1861, to German settlers Augustus and Caroline Rauschenbusch in Rochester, New York, Rauschenbusch went on to become an advocate for a campaign that would next be termed the social gospel.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where can we find the roots of our problematic ideas about "cultural authenticity"?
sasho [114]

A cultural system creates a unique world that is experienced as "reality" by its members. The people of a certain culture come to accept the "realities" which form its culture.

However, when groups of different cultures come together, their "realities" become confronted. Creating a clash of cultures. The outcome of this clash is decided by the material power of each of this groups. The group with the most material will emerge victoriously and end up influencing the other group with its cultural system. Therefore, individuals from the influenced culture will end up learning a new "reality" by force. On the other hand, individuals of the influencing culture tend to see the others as "objects of study".  

Clashes of cultures have been occurring throughout time, affecting the cultural authenticity of groups. Due to the constant blend of cultures, it is nowadays, very difficult to consider that a certain cultural group is "truly authentic".

4 0
4 years ago
How was serfdom similar to African slavery? How was it different?
Oxana [17]

Answer:A slave is property, bound to work as his/her owner sees fit. A slave has no legally protected rights of ownership. Some slaves in some sense ‘owned’ property, or even money, but this was always at the owner’s discretion, and legally it all belonged to the owner really. Serfdom, on the other hand, was an implicit contractual relationship. The serf owed both labour and rent, usually in kind — serfdom is typical of an economy with little use of money. In return, the lord owed protection and justice. These were rough times, and a common labourer without a lord would not be able to prevent marauders seizing his land.

I hope I helped and plz mark me as brainlyest

8 0
3 years ago
Contrast David Livingstone & Cecil Rhodes
lilavasa [31]
David Livingstone was a Scottish missionary, whilst Cecil Rhodes was an English businessman. Both somewhat helped kick start more colonization in Africa, with Livingstone creating a general curiosity of the Nile River, while Rhodes is quoted with starting the British Imperialism in South Africa. Rhodes is technically the founder of South Africa, while Livingstone was a missionary and explorer and was very interested in social justices, such as "rags to riches" and held an anti-slavery stance. 
7 0
3 years ago
Would John Marshall be considered a “superhero” or a “super villain” ?
pav-90 [236]

i would rather a superhero but its youre opinion

<h3>-questioneeer</h3>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which situation could be the best example of an oligopoly?
    12·2 answers
  • What language did the Aztecs speak? Thanks! :)
    11·2 answers
  • what was one major motivation behind ronald reagans decision to launch the strategic defensive intiative
    8·2 answers
  • Maria purchases a premium brand of coffee at the grocery store for $8. Which would be considered a substitute good? a coffee pot
    13·1 answer
  • Which term best describes the idea that certain rights cannot be surrendered, transferred, or taken away? a constitutional b con
    5·2 answers
  • .................................
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me in this question​
    10·1 answer
  • Where do most people live in Russia? _______ A)They live in the European side where it’s warmer, and they can grow food. B)They
    8·1 answer
  • What artist worked as a janitor in the fine arts building at Ole Miss.
    5·1 answer
  • Lines of longitude are measured
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!