This question is really opinion based, but I would take it personal when things go wrong, since I start to think what I didn't or did do that made things go wrong.
Answer:
Elaborate, repetitive and layered answers are meta discourse
Explanation:
Meta-discourse : Discussion about a discussion instead of a compact and concise way of conversing. It is a philosophical method of elaborating a topic so as to create a repetitive explanation.
Example of a meta discourse-
Cats are the best pets. Cats can be friendly and moody. Cats like to eat fishes. Cats are friendly upon giving food. Humans love to get friends with cats. They offer food to the cat.
(The paragraph is repetitive and explains the same lines)
It can be re written in the following manner:
"Cats are friendly pets who love to eat fishes"
Answer:
a. certain types of cancers take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less.
Explanation:
<u>This statement explains how we can't for the sure claim there are more benefits off the cell phone because the studies of the health effects have not been going on for long enough for us to prove that.</u>
<u>The damage is yet to be revealed, as stated in the claim, but it can be of great influence if proven that cell phones are connected to the development of cancer.</u>
<u>The B statement</u> does not add anything to the first claim and does not contradict it, as it just gives information about phone history usage and not the health benefits or risks.
<u>The C statement </u>is not counterclaiming as it adds up to the mentioned benefits - it explains how cell phones are helping life in general and do not refer to the statement about health risks.
<u>The D statement </u>mentions claims by agencies that are not health-based, and also supports the first statement, saying how there are no links to cancer development so far. It actually only goes with the original statement, and the A statement is counterclaim for it as well.
monthly mortgage payments are more expensive than rent
<span>I believe the answer is: Mr. Jones had signed an authorization to disclose the information for the test results and the result should be given to the health department.
By making this authorization, Mr. Jones has given Dr. Marks with the right to handle the information regarding his personal test as long as its within the scope of health department database. This would take out all the legal grounds that Jones could use to sue Dr. Marks.</span>
