Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
The correct answer is to prevent from getting d<span>ragged into a conflict that they don't have a true connection too
He was an isolationist and believed that it would be extremely bad to enter the conflict that was not related to them. The neutrality act was thus necessary in order to ensure that the country would remain neutral and would not wage wars that were not related to them and would not meddle in foreign affairs.</span>
Steam boats, rail roads and telegram made communication and work easy and faster.
Answer: The first one is modeling
The second one is diagramming
The third one is breaking problem into steps
Explanation:
