Answer:
A mass movement can either be slow or rapid. The slow downward movement of materials in a slope is called creep. This happens when the soil loosens up because of water and burrowing animals. In contrast to this, the rapid movement of large materials in a slope is called landslide.
Well, depending on how long the migration is, many of the animals (mainly birds) could get sick and die, lowering the population. They could be shot by hunters, lowering the population. The children of the population could get left behind and lose their way, lowering the population. I'm not entirely sure how the population could grow other than them finding and staying with another group of their own kind. hope I was helpful! :)
<span>Floods are the country's number one natural disaster.</span>
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The null hypothesis is the problem statement and alternative hypothesis is counter of the null hypothesis.
Hence, the null hypothesis here is the rate of extinction was neither higher nor lower when there were sudden climatic changes (asteroid strike)
And alternate hypothesis is "the rate of extinction was either higher or lower when there were sudden climatic changes (asteroid strike)"
Hence, option C is correct
A testable question is B. If a plant is turned upside down, which way will the roots grow?
The other options are incorrect because you cannot create some kind of experiment to prove them right or wrong.
Hope that helped you.
