Answer:
option A is correct
<em><u>hope </u></em><em><u>this </u></em><em><u>answer </u></em><em><u>helps </u></em><em><u>you </u></em><em><u>dear.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>take </u></em><em><u>care!</u></em>
Answer:
4.1
Step-by-step explanation:
5^2 + (2*8) / (2*2) + 3*3
25 + 16 / 4 + 6
41 / 10
4.1
Answer:
No it's not!
Step-by-step explanation:
because the length (long) of J and K are totally different whereas the breadth(width) of J and K is also different which does make similar in sense
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- 0 ≤ m ≤ 7
- 0.4541 cm/month; average rate of growth over last 4 months of study
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Part A</u>:
The study was concluded after 7 months. The fish cannot be expected to maintain exponential growth for any significant period beyond the observation period. A reasonable domain is ...
0 ≤ m ≤ 7
__
<u>Part B</u>:
The y-intercept is the value when m=0. It is the length of the fish at the start of the study.
__
<u>Part C</u>:
The average rate of change on the interval [3, 7] is given by ...
(f(7) -f(3))/(7 -3) = (4(1.08^7) -4(1.08^3))/4 = 1.08^3·(1.08^4 -1)
≈ 0.4541 cm/month
This is the average growth rate of the fish in cm per month over the period from 3 months to 7 months.