A tax cut that will last for only a year will not have a huge effect on the aggregate demand as the aggregate demand increases only when the tax cut is permanent.
The given statement is false.
<h3>What is a tax?</h3>
A tax is a liability imposed on the taxpayer to pay a specified sum to the government based on the income they have earned in the previous year.
When the cutting of taxes becomes permanent in the country, then the citizens can start to acquire more which will increase the spending. The families will expect that the tax cuts are for the longer term which now induces them to buy and spend more and also act as an addition to their incomes. This whole impact would eventually lead to rising in aggregate demand.
Therefore, the demand increases when the tax cuts are permanent rather than when tax cuts are for only one year.
Learn more about the tax cut policies  in the related link:
brainly.com/question/13924294
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Cash flow from operating activities:  
Net income                                                                     $116
Adjustment to reconcile net income to cash basis:  
Depreciation expense ($359+1-347)                              $13
Gain on sale of equipment                                              (14)
Decrease in account receivable (40-39)                         $1
Decrease in inventory (44-43)                                          $1
Increase in account payable (30-26)                               $4
Decrease in accrued liabilities (18-15)                              (3)
Decrease in income tax payable (40-39)                         (1)
Net cash flow from operating activities                           $117
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: B
Explanation: Are linked globally in ways that transcend national political boundaries
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Matthew decides to buy expensive designer jeans. Less expensive jeans are available, but the added cost of the designer brand is worth it to Matthew most likely because His preference is for designer labels, since the assertions made by the other manufacturers, which claim that designer trousers are less expensive, are illogical. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the cost?</h3>
Generally, payment is required before it can be obtained or completed.
In conclusion, Affluent designer jeans are Matthew's choice. There are cheaper jeans out there, but Matthew most certainly prefers designer labels since the arguments of the other manufacturers, who say that designer pants are less costly, are irrational.
Read more about cost
brainly.com/question/15135554
 #SPJ1