Two limitations to individual rights that I would support in this situation, for instance, after a hurricane, are <u>restrictions to travel</u> and <u>limited coverage by the press.
</u>
<em>Restrictions to travel</em>. After the impact of a Hurricane like “Katrina” that destroyed New Orleans city area, it is of the utmost importance that people stay in refugees specially prepared by the government or civil protection in cases of disasters. The weather conditions during or after the hurricane makes the road very difficult. Or maybe, there is some affectation to highways or rural roads.
The more people are on the road, more traffic. And this could complicate the help provided by highway patrol, ambulances or any rescue service that need to get to specific location on time to save lives.
The other limitation should be to the <em>coverage of the Press</em>. In calamities like the aftermath of a hurricane, it is an invasion of the privacy that the reporter is in front of the woman who has lost her children an homeless, asking questions about “how do you feel in this moment?” Another terrible situation is the cameraman taking shots at the half destructed house and the people in horror outside the premises.
These limitations are related to the following amendment in the Bill of Rights:
The Fourth Amendment. To force an evacuation probably could be a violation of the people’s right to be safe in their houses and secure its papers and effects. But a hurricane this big like Katrina is an emergency and the authorities don’t know the risk for people in staying in homes.
The Ninth Amendment. Publishing pictures or showing video of the victims of the hurricane could be a violation of the right to privacy of family members. So the Media should respect these terrible moments and be very cautious in its covering.