One significant check the executive branch has on the legislative branch is the presidential veto. The president can also pardon people impeached by congress.
In return, the United States had to "<span>A) ask the states to return seized Loyalist properties," since Britain considered many of these properties as being unfairly obtained. </span>
This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation: because some countries sell a lot of their things to be able to pay for the wepons that the military needs. And alot of things gets destroyed because of war going on.
