The Weberian notion that we acknowledge the rightful roles of our leaders or laws is called legitimacy.
What is the real definition of legitimacy?
A typical definition of legitimacy in political science and sociology is the conviction that a law, institution, or leader has the authority to rule. An individual's assessment of the propriety of a hierarchy between a rule or ruler and the subject, as well as the subordinate's duties to the rule or ruler, is involved.
What is the importance of legitimacy?
The accomplishment of progress in a legitimate government depends on legitimacy. Legitimacy is the acceptance and acknowledgment by the general public of a leader's moral authority to rule, formulate, and carry out political choices.
Learn more about legitimacy: brainly.com/question/13893225
#SPJ4
Limited Government: We have a bill of rights
<span>Separation of Powers: Supreme court, President, and Congress
</span>
<span>Checks and Balances: The president can veto stuff from congress and congress can override the veto with 2/3 vote. Supreme court can declare things unconstitutional.
</span>
<span>Judicial Review: Supreme court can declare things unconstitutional.
</span>
<span>Federalism: the theory or advocacy of federal principles for dividing powers between member units and common institutions.
I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
</span>
Answer:
Opechancanough
Cause of death-Shot in the back while a prisoner
Resting place-Pamunkey Reservation King William, Virginia, U.S.
Relatives Chief Powhatan (brother) Pocahontas (niece) John Rolfe (nephew-in-law)
Military service
/hope this helps/
Answer:
The answers are <u>cognitive conflict</u> and <u>affective conflict</u>
Explanation:
In any organization, be it family, work, sports team, etc., conflict are very common. There are two main different types of conflict that can arise: Task-related, or cognitive conflict; and relationship, or affective conflict. Cognitive conflict generally refers to differences between how to best perform an activity, how to achieve a goal, or the best course of action. Affective conflict, on the other hand, refers to personal differences between the involved parties, which lead to negative emotional responses.
In your example, this can be seen very clearly: differences between you and the owner were over differences in judgement, but deteriorated to the point where they are more emotional and directed personally toward one another. It thus can be said that you initially experienced <u>cognitive conflict</u>, but now are experiencing <u>affective conflict</u>.
a) The winner-take-all feature is a rule for the Electoral College. It basically says that out of the 48 states that participate, whichever candidate has the majority or popular vote takes all of the state’s Electoral votes.
(b) Presidential candidates will be affected by the electoral college because one of their main focuses is media and money, on states where a lot of people vote based on their own theories. Not leaning towards being Democrat or Republican. Being able to change their thoughts would have a big advantage for them. Another reason effecting presidential candidates is picking Vice Presidents. They will choose a candidate that is on the same party and to bring more appeal to the campaign.
(c) One example, to explain why winner-takes-all can relate to third party candidates, is because it is difficult to win electoral college meaning for third party candidates it’s harder to raise or gain funds.
(d) The Electoral College has been around for so long that to abolish it would require a change in a constitutional amendment. Also it gives confidence and fairness to small states because each elector represents fewer people than in the larger states.
