3.2m casts 1.54m shadow.
3.2÷1.54= 160/77 (2.077922077922...)
50.75 × 160/77= 105.454545...
105m to the nearest meter.
Answer:
Option B is correct.
Angle DAC is congruent to angle DAB
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Segment AC is congruent to segment AB.
In ΔABD and ΔACD
[Given]
[Congruent sides have the same length]
AB = AC [Side]
AD = AD [Common side]
[Angle]
Side Angle Side(SAS) Postulate states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Then by SAS,

By CPCT [Corresponding Parts of congruent Triangles are congruent]
then;

therefore, only statement which is used to prove that angle ABD is congruent to angle ACD is: Angle DAC is congruent to DAB
Answer: 64 %
Step-by-step explanation:
Assume attendance last year to be equal to "x"
- An increase in percentage sees us add the percentage amount to 100.
- A decrease in percentage sees us subtract the percentage amount from 100.
Projected attendance = ((100+25)/100) * x = 1.25x
Actual attendance = ((100-20)/100) * x = 0.80x
Hence ratio of a actual to projected attendance = 0.80x/1.25x = 0.64
Convert into percentage = 0.64 * 100 = 64 %
Answer:
No, You can't. You have to make their denominators equal!

Step-by-step explanation:
So first, you make their denominators equal!

Multiplying both the numerator and denominator with the same number results in the same fraction, just un-simplified
So, we input it!

There you go!
Hope you get better at math!(gets wayyyyyyyyyyy...y more complicated later)
Hope this helps!
See Ya!
P.S. Stay Safe!
A person sold 100 shares of a stock at a loss of 40%.
selling price for the 100 shares was $3,000
Let the stock was bought at $x then we can write

Hence Amount paid for the Stock was $5000