1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ad-work [718]
3 years ago
14

Indicators of potential workplace violence: A. Cannot usually be identified before an employee 'snaps' and commits a violent act

. B. Can often be managed and treated if recognized. C. Are completely individualized and therefore impossible to protect against. D. Can only be recognized by trained mental health experts.
Social Studies
1 answer:
exis [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: option B

Explanation:

Since they are indictors of potential work place violence ,they can be managed.

I am picking the word indicator, becasue this is to preinfom someone or something of a potential circumstance to happen over a period of time if the case maybe. This is an indictor to pre-inform to make known that something will happen. Then it can be managed, work place violence can be managed once there exist a sign such as the passage related to indicator. So option B potentially is the right answer.

You might be interested in
Do you pay student loans before graduation
g100num [7]
No. The loan repayments begin after graduation
7 0
3 years ago
A 2-year old cat presents 15 minutes after being attacked by a dog. The cat is in cardiac arrest. The owner wants CPR to be unde
koban [17]

Answer:

In that particular scenario and in case of the absence of the veterinarian, a licensed veterinary technician can initiate the life-saving procedures in order to kept the cat alive. And the owner is requesting, so there is no reason to start tracheal intubation and CPR.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did Hamburg change its name to North Augusta shortly after World War I began? *
olasank [31]

The Hamburg Massacre (or Red Shirt Massacre or Hamburg riot) was a key event in the African American town of Hamburg, South Carolina in July 1876, leading up to the last election season of the Reconstruction Era. It was the first of a series of civil disturbances planned and carried out by white Democrats in the majority-black Republican Edgefield District, with the goal of suppressing black voting, disrupting Republican meetings, and suppressing black Americans civil rights, through actual and threatened violence.[1]

Beginning with a dispute over free passage on a public road, the massacre was rooted in racial hatred and political motives. A court hearing attracted armed white "rifle clubs," colloquially called the "Red Shirts". Desiring to regain control of state governments and eradicate the civil rights of black Americans, over 100 white men attacked about 30 black servicemen of the National Guard at the armory, killing two as they tried to leave that night. Later that night, the Red Shirts tortured and murdered four of the militia while holding them as prisoners, and wounded several others. In total, the events in Hamburg resulted in the death of one white man and six black men with several more blacks being wounded. Although 94 white men were indicted for murder by a coroner's jury, none were prosecuted.

The events were a catalyst in the overarching violence in the volatile 1876 election campaign. There were other episodes of violence in the months before the election, including an estimated 100 blacks killed during several days in Ellenton, South Carolina, also in Aiken County. The Southern Democrats succeeded in "redeeming" the state government and electing Wade Hampton III as governor. During the remainder of the century, they passed laws to establish single-party white rule, impose legal segregation and "Jim Crow," and disenfranchise blacks with a new state constitution adopted in 1895. This exclusion of blacks from the political system was effectively maintained into the late 1960s.

3 0
3 years ago
Who were the three main European rivals in North America?
inna [77]

The correct answer is option B. The three main European rivals in North America were England, France and Spain. These three countries conducted wars against each other in North American territory so that they could all keep their colonies and expand the territory over their countries could rule. At the end of The French and Indian War, England would be the clear winner out of the three, with the most territory under its power.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What resources are scarce in the uk healthcare system?
sergejj [24]
Vaccines are beginning to become scarce in the uk
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A constructionist approach encourages us to __________ when we see social problems claims. assume that we are being manipulated
    5·2 answers
  • what is article 16 of south africa's bill of rights and whether the media reflects it when reporting
    12·1 answer
  • Fresh harvest company, which is based on georgia, packages and sells vegetables. hayden, who is a resident of indiana, buys a fr
    5·2 answers
  • Do you believe we have a true meritocracy in the United States? Why, or why not?
    10·1 answer
  • The Port Authority is thinking about dredging the harbor to make it deeper for large ships. Before they do this, they hire a tea
    13·2 answers
  • By completing rituals, individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder believe they can neutralize the threat of something bad. T
    11·1 answer
  • Which area of economics uses value judgments to make recommendations for future actions?
    7·2 answers
  • How does Shere Khan's decision to break the la
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a new foreign policy?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the Roman empire's views on Christianity at various points in its history? What caused them to change over time?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!