1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lina20 [59]
3 years ago
15

Our aim is a democratic peace, a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman.—President Bush, 2004 State of

the Union The image below represents Theodore Roosevelt, president from 1901 to 1909, known for the phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick." Which of the following is a valid statement about the artist's judgment in the image compared to the quote? Address
History
2 answers:
Anna71 [15]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:President Roosevelt was willing to trample on human rights to win wars while President Bush would not

Explanation:

Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
3 0
The quote of president Bush suggests that he values peace and democracy and that this peace has to be built upon human rights.

The Graphic, which I believe represents president Roosevelt hitting a dove with a stick, suggests that Roosevelt would sacrifice human rights for peace, which President Bush would not. 
(I actually don't agree with this statement, just interpret the graphic)
You might be interested in
In an energy pyramid, why is energy<br> reduced at each higher level of the<br> pyramid?
ozzi

Answer:

Energy decreases because it moves up trophic levels since energy is misplaced as metabolic warm when the life forms from one trophic level are expended by life forms from another level. Trophic level exchange proficiency (TLTE) measures the amount of vitality that's exchanged between trophic levels.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
I am opposed to slavery and secession, but I can’t fight against my own people or my state. Who am I?
gavmur [86]

Answer:

1. Robert E. Lee

2. Ulysses S. Grant

3. Winfield Scott

4. George B. McClellan

5. Robert E. Lee

6. Robert E. Lee

7. J.E.B Stuart

8. Philip Sheridan

9. Thomas Jackson

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The Silk Road was a trade route between
djverab [1.8K]
The silk road is an ancient overland trade route that connects China with Europe.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the British act alone during king Leopolds rule
Julli [10]

Answer:

Mark as brainliest

Explanation:

symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.

Issue Section:

 Articles

INTRODUCTION

The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5

If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9

5 0
4 years ago
Which statement best summarizes the effects of world war I on the ottoman empire
LuckyWell [14K]

since the 1800s theres been a lot of rebelius uprisings on the balkans expecialy in the begining of the 1900s(Ilinden Uprising) then the Ottoman Empire was at war (First Bakan War 1911-12) with Montenegro(started the war), Serbia, Macedonia, Bugaria and Greece in 1913(2nd Balkan war) Greece, Serbia, and Bugaria divided Macedonia Greece took Aegon Macedonia Serbia took Vardar Macedonia Bugaria(stared the war) took Pirin Macedonia(smalest part) ---- Ottoman Empire, after 1700s had to maintain status quo for falling technologicaly and economicaly apart from European counterparts. Diplomaticaly it could have lost its existence long time ago if England and France did not prevent Russia from further advancing. However at the last times of the empire English left supporting and Italy invaded Tripoli, at that time with Russian support Balkan Wars began which was probably the greatest defeat of Ottoman Empire, by the countries it ruled for 4 centuries directly or as vassals. As nobody wanted to ally with Ottoman Empire, Germany was only country that was interested in allying. Great German aid was made, in both army and industry. Construction of Istanbul-Baghdad railroad was also maintained by German industry. Under this pro-German aids Ottoman Empire sought to gain its old power, at least on Balkans, which was so close to its capital and were highly populated by Turkish population. Note: By the Ottoman official records 2,5 million immigrants came from newly founded countries which is a real high number as Turkish population of Ottoman Empire was about 10 millions before WW1.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was Jerry Lisker? Was he present at the Stonewall Riots?
    13·1 answer
  • 2. PART B: Which TWO of the following phrases from the text best support the answer to Part A? [RI.1] A. “Earlier in the week Em
    7·1 answer
  • People who discover, study, interpret, and write history are called
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following terms is used for the second leg of the route known as the triangular trade,which carried enslaved Africa
    15·1 answer
  • Match the following items. 1. Allied attack beginning takeover of France Nagasaki 2. Japanese bombing attack on the United State
    7·2 answers
  • After King George III rejected the Olive Branch Petition, Parliament passed the Prohibitory Act, which
    10·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the domestic and factory methods of production
    14·1 answer
  • What is the stance of other Middle Eastern nations in regards to the<br> conflict?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a trait of Afro Pop music? a. the use of tribal chanting c. many different beats throughout the song b
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!