Answer:
Products Selling price Unit variable cost
$ $
Junior 50 15
Adult 75 25
Expert <u>110 </u> <u> 60</u>
Total <u> 235 </u> <u> 100</u>
The sales price per composite unit = $235
The contribution margin per composite unit
= Composite selling price - Composite unit variable cost
= $235 - $100
= $135
Break-even point in units
= <u>Fixed cost</u>
Contribution per unit
= <u>$114,750</u>
$135
= 850 units
Break-even point in dollars
= Break-even point in units x Composite selling price
= 850 units x $235
= $199,750
Income Statement
$
Total contribution ($135 x 850 units) 114,750
Less: Fixed cost <u>114,750</u>
Net profit <u> 0</u>
Explanation:
Sales price per composite unit is the aggregate of all the selling prices.
Contribution margin per composite unit equals composite selling price minus composite unit variable cost.
Break-even point in units is fixed cost divided per composite contribution margin per unit.
Break-even point in dollars equal break-even point in units multiplied by selling price.
Income statement is prepared by deducting the total fixed cost from the total contribution.
Answer:
equipment 3,700
Explanation:
First we calcualte the values of the machine given up:
<u>traded-out assets</u>
purchased 23000
depreciation <u>20,000 </u>
book value 3,000
fair value 5,000
gain on disposal 2,000
This gain would be recognzie if there was commercial substance. In this case we don't have commercial substance. So it is deffered.
Value given up forthe new equipment:
cash 700
traded-out <u>5,000 </u>
total value 5,700
We subtract the deffered gain on disposal to get the accounting value for the new equipment:
deferred gain (2,000)
accounting value 3,700
The machine will enter the accounting with 3,700
journal entry
equipment 3,700
acc del 20,000
equipment 23,000
cash 700
Answer and Explanation:
a. The given statement is true as the corner point at the objective function should be feasible solution which is no longer as compared with the value for every adjacent CPF solution as compared with its optimal
b. The given statement is false as the solution can be an edge
c. The given statement is true as it shows the direct relation between the two things
Answer:
A. can afford to take on additional risk; increases
Explanation:
Saying that Risk and Return go hand in hand, tells us that you <u>can afford to take additional risk </u> as the length of the investment horizon <u>increases</u>. Increasing the length of the investment horizon increases the ability to take on additional risk because in the long run the investment pays off while it may be choppy in the short time horizon.
