Answer:
Initiative versus guilt.
Explanation:
Initiative versus guilt: Proposed by Erik Erikson's in his psychosocial development theory and is the third stage.
During this stage, a child tends to be assertive very frequently. The child starts feeling secure and develop a feeling of initiative in making decisions on their own.
The stage starts from three years of age and last till five years, and the given age is specifically a rapid-developing years of a child's life.
Answer:
Decline/ Refuse to grant permission
Explanation: Guests with fake ID's do not have authorized access. Therefore, when such group of guest are detected by the server, there request should be rejected.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Electors cast the votes that decide who becomes president.
According to evolutionary psychologists, motivations for s∈x, aggression, satisfaction of hunger, and achievement are rooted in our survival, as seen below.
<h3>What is evolutionary psychology?</h3>
Evolutionary psychology studies human behavior from a biological point of view, more specifically from the perspective of evolution. As we know, the theory of evolution takes into consideration the conditions and needs for survival. Therefore, evolutionary psychologist also explain behavior as rooted in our survival.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about evolutionary psychology here:
brainly.com/question/25207796
#SPJ1
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
