Answer:
No. She suffered no physical impact
Explanation:
Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when a person engages in an act that can cause severe emotional distress to another .
The plaintiff must be able to prove that the act was done willfully or provide an evidence that
- It was a result of defendant's negligence
- Plaintiff suffered emotional distress a direct result of the action
- The action was foreseeable by the defendant
- The plaintiff was in a danger zone
before he can win a claim.
The question here is how to prove emotional stress? The plaintiff must be able to show a verifiable physical injury that is linked to the emotional distressed suffered.
Answer:
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cost of chair P = $60
Cost of chair Q = $90
Number of chair P ordered = p
Number of chair Q ordered = q
Now,
Total number of chairs ordered
= Number of chair P ordered + Number of chair Q ordered
= p + q
Total cost of chairs ordered = $60p + $90q
Therefore,
Average cost of a chair
= [Total cost of chairs ordered ] ÷ [Total number of chairs ordered]
=
Answer: e. Airline O has less lease assets at the inception of the lease
Explanation:
With operating leases, the entity leasing the asset or the lessee, does not get the rights to ownership of the asset being leased but instead simply pay a fee or sort of rent for leasing the asset.
With a finance lease however, ownership is passed to the lessee for the lease period and the lessee would have to depreciate the asset and record it in its books.
Airline O will therefore not record any assets but Airline F will. This means that Airline F will have more assets than O because it had to record its assets but O did not.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
Answer:
It is "following an expansionary monetary policy".
Explanation:
When the central bank uses expansionary monetary policy, money supply increases and the interest rates decreases, this will lead to no change in aggregate demand. It also affects the value of the currency and that is lowering its value but there is improvement in growth of domestic economy.
