All categories

4 years ago

A manager who wants control over decisions and expects employees to obey is what type of manager

Business

2 answers:

Vanyuwa [196]4 years ago

7 0

Answer: C: an authoritarian manager

A manager who wants control over decisions and expects employees to obey is an authoritarian manager.

Explanation:

An authoritarian manager refers to a manager who has control over his employees. He makes decision on his own with or without little consultation from his subordinates and act as their supervisor. Thus, decision making is made from his own belief and perspectives of which they must obey. As a result, he does not make work flexible to his employees.

AfilCa [17]4 years ago

3 0

The answer is b or a but I mean it both means the same thing, if this is on Plato it's a

You might be interested in

4. Savings are particularly important to young people because:

katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

I think it's D

Explanation:

because savings are in the beginning of their financial lives,”

I hope this helped u :)

3 0

3 years ago

Discount Airlines is preparing a contribution margin report segmented by route. The following information is available: Atlanta/

IgorC [24]

Answer:

17.3%

Explanation:

The contribution margin ratio is shown below:

Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin ÷ Sales × 100

where,

Contribution margin is

= Sales - variable cost

Sales arise from passengers ($1,250 × 7,100) $8,875,000

Less:

Food ($7 × 7,100) $497,00

Selling ($90 × 7,100) $639,000

Fuel ($15 × 190,000) $2,850,000

Wages ($20 × 190,000) $3,800,000

Total variable cost ($7,338,700)

Contribution margin $1,536,300

So, the contribution margin ratio is

= $1,536,300 ÷ $8,875,000

= 17.3%

8 0

3 years ago

Jamal purchased a Subway franchise in a great location across the street from an outlet mall. After two years in business, Jamal

Alchen [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.

The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.

The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.

So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.

One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.

7 0

4 years ago

1. A major controversy that is yet to be resolved about the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 200

qaws [65]

Answer:

C. What the program will ultimately cost the federal government

Explanation:

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 was an attempt to make improvements or amendments to the Social Security Act. It radically changed the playing field for private plans participating in the Medicare program by substantially raising monthly payment rates in an effort to stabilize the market and reverse the decline in benefit generosity. It also provided for voluntary prescription drugs under the medicare program. However, the utilization and cost of the program skyrocketed as soon as the funding source was established. It has remained unknown what the program will ultimately cost the federal government, no wonder the current administration under Trump wants to turn it upside down.

3 0

3 years ago

"Between 2000 and 2008, the price of oil increased from $30 per barrel to $140 per barrel, and the price of gasoline in the Unit

KiRa [710]

Answer:

C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.

Explanation:

During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.

Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.

3 0

3 years ago