The term revenue refers to income, <span>especially when of a company or organization and of a substantial nature.</span>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The Buddha was a man named Siddhartha Gautama. Since his death, his teachings are a source of authority for Theravada Buddhists. The Buddha does not have the status of a god as he is dead.
Answer: Object permanence
Explanation: Object permanence refers to the mental ability of a child to know or belief that an object continue to exist even when they can no longer be heard, seen or felt. At the very early stage of a child, they seem to belief that once an object can no longer be heard or seen, then such objects has seized to exist. Such that when an object is hidden from a child view or taken out of sight, they belief such object has disappeared because they lack the mental ability to realize that maybe the object was hidden or kept away from them.
Answer:
Option a==> yellow-dog contracts.
Explanation:
In the United States of America, there was a period( 1920s and early 1930s) that in order to secure a job, the employees has to come into aggreement with the employers that they will never form or join any union relating to labour. This case was very rampant in the public sector of the economy in which people seeking for work has to give up their rights to protest for unjustice ( for example teachers during those times were not to join any labour union).
The reason behind yellow-dog contracts is to make sure that employers are able to stop workers from protesting.
Therefore, we can see from the Explanation above that Rosedale Shoe Factory was making use of yellow-dog contracts.
Thanks to decisions by the Supreme Court, home ownership in the United States is more inclusive of other races apart from White Americans.
Both before and after the Fair Housing Act formally made it illegal to discriminate based on a person's race and gender, the Supreme Court made some decisions that tried to make home ownership more inclusive such as:
- Shelley v. Kraemer - here the Supreme Court ruled that it was not possible to enforce covenants in the deeds to property that were restrictive based on race.
- Jones v. Mayer Co. - the Supreme Court ruled that any form of racial discrimination in home ownership was illegal
These are just two cases where the Supreme Court's decision affected homeownership but there are more.
We can conclude however, that based on the Supreme Court's decisions, homeownership is more inclusive of other races.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2630375.</em>
