Saint Thomas would most likely said that the only reason he conducted the 'homophobic actions' was because it violate the rules of God.
In that time, this kind of defense was perfectly plausible since the Church at that time had a huge influence in the Government. But our time, this type of reason wouldn't be plausible.
C. They both believed that individuals have the right and the responsibility to protest unjust laws.
Thoreau and M. Luther King believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They believed that the government had flaws . They believed that one should stand up for what he or she believes in, as well as accepting the consequences for his actions.
Answer:
1. Protestants were radical reformers who believed in the separation between eclesiastic and state affairs.
2. Saint Ignatius of Loyola was a Spanish priest that in 1540, with the approval of Pope Paul III, founded the Society of Jesus (also known as Jesuits).
3. Confession is a regular method by which Christian worshippers can, after being baptised, clear their sins and release from punishment.
4. Pope Leo X, after ordering an investigation conducted by Silvestre Mazzolini, declared Martin Luther a heretic and therefore excomulgated him from church in 1521.
5. Anglican Church was founded by bishop Charles Thomas Longley, after an edict from Henry VIII (King of England).
There was fertile land in the area known as the willamente river valley
Thanks to decisions by the Supreme Court, home ownership in the United States is more inclusive of other races apart from White Americans.
Both before and after the Fair Housing Act formally made it illegal to discriminate based on a person's race and gender, the Supreme Court made some decisions that tried to make home ownership more inclusive such as:
- Shelley v. Kraemer - here the Supreme Court ruled that it was not possible to enforce covenants in the deeds to property that were restrictive based on race.
- Jones v. Mayer Co. - the Supreme Court ruled that any form of racial discrimination in home ownership was illegal
These are just two cases where the Supreme Court's decision affected homeownership but there are more.
We can conclude however, that based on the Supreme Court's decisions, homeownership is more inclusive of other races.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2630375.</em>
