$60 one year ago. The stock is now worth $70. During the year, the stock paid a dividend of $2.25. The total return to George from owning the stock would be 20% (after rounding off the answer to the nearest whole percent).
- Total return on share is the summation of dividend and price appreciation.
- Since, the dividend = $2.25
- Then, to ascertain price appreciation we need to subtract the dividend from the total return on the share.
- Price appreciation = $70 - $60 = $10
- Total return can be calculated hence.
- Total return = $10 + $2.25 = $12.25
- Therefore, the total return for George was $12.25.
- To round off the answer to the nearest whole percentage:
- Total return percent = $12.25/$60 = 20% approximately
Therefore, the total return to George from owning the stock would be 20%.
Learn more about total returns here:
brainly.com/question/13078425
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is B.) Cost, revenue, and assets invested in the center
Explanation:
An investment center is a responsibility center in which the department manager is responsible for costs, revenues and assets for the department.
An investment center is also a business unit in a firm that can utilize capital to contribute directly to a company's profitability.
Examples of departments that make up the cost center are the human resource and marketing departments, units that falls under a profit center include the manufacturing and sales department.
Answer:
Variable cost per unit= $7.2 per unit
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Month Total Maintenance Costs Total Machine Hours
January: $2,590 - 330
February: $2,890 - 380
March: $3,490 - 530
April: $4,390 - 660
May: $3,090 - 530
June: $5,470 - 730
To calculate the variable cost under the high-low method, we need to use the following formula:
Variable cost per unit= (Highest activity cost - Lowest activity cost)/ (Highest activity units - Lowest activity units)
Variable cost per unit= (5,470 - 2,590) / (730 - 330)
Variable cost per unit= $7.2 per unit
Answer:
The correct answer is Option B.
Explanation:
Based on IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, subsequent events can be an adjusting event or non-adjusting event. If it is an adjusting event, it means an event after the reporting date before the audited financial statements are signed that provides further evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date. However, non-adjusting events are events after the reporting date that are indicative of a condition that arose after the reporting date, this requires disclosure in the financial statements while for adjusting events, the financial statements are adjusted for condition that arose after the reporting date.
The declaration of the customer as bankrupt is an adjusting event since it affects the receivable collection, hence the need to adjust it as uncollectible,
I dont know what to tell you try contacting brainly or refresh your screen
