Answer:
The $500 is the opportunity cost.
Explanation:
The sunk cost can be defined as a cost that has already been incurred. Such as cost can no longer be recovered. A sunk cost is considered to be irrelevant and is excluded from decision making.
If an individual decided to take an accounting course and paid the tuition fee of $500 and gets a job offer later. If he/she decides to take up the job the tuition fee paid will be the sunk cost which cannot be recovered anymore.
U need to provide the options we can pick from please
Answer:
<h2>1) The answer is option a) or True.</h2><h2>2) Generally all contracts are assumed to be <u>Shipment </u> contracts if nothing to the contrary is stated in the contract.</h2><h2>3) The seller is required to deliver the goods to a particular destination in a destination contract,usually directly to the <u>buyer</u>
<u>.</u></h2><h2>4) The answer is option a) or True.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
- A shipment contract mandates that the seller of any good or service is obligated to deliver the specified shipment to a common carrier for delivery to the buyer but not directly to the buyer's destination.Under the shipment contracts,the seller is not responsible for the condition of the shipment or package during the delivery point and time to the buyer.
- If nothing is specifically mentioned in the contract regarding the delivery of the shipment,it assumably qualifies as a shipment contract and the seller is only liable to dispatch the shipment to the transportation carrier and not obligated to send it directly to the buyer's destination.
- Under a destination contract,the seller is officially obligated to dispatch the concerned goods or shipment directly to the buyer's actual destination.Hence,the seller's obligation is incomplete until the shipment subsequently reaches the buyer's destination.
- For destination contract,at the point of delivery,the burden of risk and title associated with the condition and ownership of the specified shipment is passed onto the buyer and seller is not officially or legally liable regarding the same.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
An economic agent should specialise in the production of the good for which it has a comparative advantage in its production.
An economic agent has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other economic agents.
Anne's opportunity cost in pie production = 4/3=1.33
Anne's opportunity cost in shirt production = 3/4 = 0.75
Mary's opportunity cost in pie production = 5/2 = 2.5
Mary's opportunity cost in shirt production = 2/5 = 0.4
Anne has a comparative advantage in the production of pies and Mary has a comparative advantage in the production of shirts.
Anne should specialise in pie production and Mary should specialise in shirt production.
I hope my answer helps you
