<u>Answer-</u>
<em>The estimated population in 2013 is </em><em>3081.</em>
<u>Solution-</u>
This can be represented as exponential decreasing function,

Where,
-
a = starting amount
- r = rate
- t = years
Putting the values,




As population can not be in fraction, so after rounding off the estimated population in 2013 is 3081.
We are required to compare the magnitude for two earthquake intensity:
the larger intensity is 7.9
the smaller intensity is 3.7
thus the ratio of the intensity will be:
(larger intensity)/(smaller intensity)
=7.9/3.7
=2.135
~2
Thus we conclude that:
The larger earthquake's intensity was 2 times as great as the smaller earthquake's intensity.
Problem 1) Line n is the line of symmetry (not line o) because we can fold the lower half to match up with the upper half. The folding line is over line n.
Problem 2) I agree. Nice work on getting the correct answer. The folding line is a vertical line through the center
Problem 3) It's hard to say for sure, but I think the top left corner is NOT reflective over any line of symmetry no matter how you rotate it. So I would uncheck that box. I agree with your other choices though. Great job with those.
It is known that 6 things can get arranged in 720 ways, let's look at the math of this.
There are six things so:
1×2
2×3
6×4
24×5
120×6
720
Answer:
- 5/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Arrange this line equation into y = mx + b form m = slope
y = 2/5x + 12/5
then perpindicular line = - 1/m = - 1/ (2/5) = - 5/2