The owners of the property claimed the city had violated the Fifth Amendment's takings clause, which forbade the government from seizing private property without just compensation for public use.
<h3>What was the central tenet in Kelo v. City of New London?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Kelo v. City of New London that New London could acquire privately owned lands for private development as part of its economic revitalization strategy.
The rationality of this project was The property owners contended that the city had violated the Amendment's takings provision, which guarantees that the government will not take private property for public use without just compensation.
Learn more about Kelo v. City of New London:
brainly.com/question/10992257
#SPJ1
Andrew Jackson was the one who pushed for the Indian Removal Act.
Type of psychological autopsy will most likely be performed on jacob?
d. suicide psychological autopsy
<span>12 members were appointed by the King (prominent wealthy landowners) because the king controlled Georgia when it became a royal colony. Hope this helped!</span>
Answer:
we must develop industry we must overcome pollution