Answer:
168, a little of both
Step-by-step explanation:
Make 14 out of 50, 14/50 simplified its 7/25, multiply it by 600 and you get 168 its a little of both because half the info we were given its experimental since it is not theorized, what we're being given (the question) and what we gave is theorized since we didn't actually perform an experiment to get a real answer
<em>The answer to 32.85÷15 is 2.19. First, you need to change 32.85 into a whole number. To do that, multiply by powers of ten. There are 2 powers of ten need to turn 32.85 to a whole number. Whatever you do to one side, you must do to the other. So, add 2 zeros to 15. The expression becomes 3,285÷1500. The answer is 2.19</em>
Your question seems to be incomplete
The answer is choice C. The reason why is because f(2010) = t(2010). The outputs of the f(x) and t(x) functions are the same when the input is x = 2010. In this case, the output is 740.
Answer:
When you set the function equal to zero, the solution is x = 3; therefore, the graph has an x-intercept at x = 3.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given function is 
.
So, for real zeros and x-intercept, the y-coordinate must be equal to zero.
Then it becomes 
⇒ x - 2 = 1 {Since log 1 = 0}
⇒ x = 3
Therefore, when you set the function equal to zero, the solution is x = 3; therefore, the graph has an x-intercept at x = 3. (Answer)
