A painter paints a wall in x hours, so the fraction of the wall that she paints in 3 hours is

Write

IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

y = 2 ( x − 1 ) ^ 2 + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

y = a ( x − h ) ^ 2 + k

where vertex is (h,k) = (1,2)

h=1, k=2

y = a ( x − 1 ) ^ 2 + 2

sub ( 3,10)

10 = a (3 - 1)^2 + 2

a=2

y = 2 ( x − 1 ) ^ 2 + 2

7 0

3 years ago

Start a conversation/argument in the comments

Digiron [165]

Answer:

What do we start a convo or an argumnet about...and why?

Step-by-step explanation:

but heres one : Donald Trump or Biden?

heheheheheheh

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help me do this please

Rom4ik [11]

Use the distributive property.
(3/8)*(16x-24)=(3/8)(16x)-(3/8)(24)
16x*3/8=48x/8=6x
24*3/8=72/8=9
6x+9

Hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

Match these similar triangles proof

AlekseyPX

Answer:

B

C

F

D

H

A

G

E

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok. They are trying to reconstruct the smaller looking triangle in the bigger triangle using angle A as the common angle.

The first statement is always the given.

Second they constructed line segment XY into the bigger triangle so that XY is parallel to BC.

Third, from the construction of the parallel lines we can now find corresponding angles that are congruent. This would be the use of F.

Since we have all three angles in triangle AXY and triangle ABC, then the construction of the smaller triangle we made inside the bigger triangle is similar to the bigger triangle. So we have the triangles are similar. You could say E or D here in my opinion. This is choice D.

Fifth the creation of those fractions of sides being equal comes from us knowing the corresponding sides of similar triangles are proportional. This is choice H.

Things looked cut off for the sixth thing so I can't fully read it, but it is possible a substitution has occured.

The seventh thing is a congruence statement which can be proven by a congruence postulate. The only one listed is SAS. So that is G.

The last thing, since the triangle construction is congruent to the smaller triangle then we know the smaller triangle is also similar to the bigger triangle since the bigger one is also similar to the construction we made. I really think E and D is interchangeable. Choice E goes here.

7 0

3 years ago

Fiona invested $1000 at 7% compounded continuously. At the same time, Maria invested $1100 at 7% compounded daily. How long will

Natali [406]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

14,201 years

Step-by-step explanation:

The two compound interest formulas are ...

A = P·e^(rt) . . . . . continuous compounding at rate r for t years

A = P·(1 +r/365)^(365t) . . . . . daily compounding at rate r for t years

We went the amounts to be equal:

1000·e^(0.07t) = 1100·(1+0.07/365)^(365t)

Dividing by 1000(1 +0.07/365)^(365t), we have ...

((e^0.07)/(1+0.07/365)^365)^t = 1.1

The base of the exponential on the left is ...

( e^0.07)/(1+0.07/365)^365 ≈ 1.00000671149321522

Taking logs, we have ...

t×ln(1.00000671149321522) = ln(1.1)

t = ln(1.1)/ln(1.00000671149321522) ≈ 0.09531018/(6.7114704·10^-6)

t ≈ 14,201.09 . . . . . years

It will take about 14,201 years for the investments to be equal.

_____

Additional comment

The investment value at that time will be about $5.269·10^434. (That's a larger number than anything countable in the known universe, including energy quanta.)

These calculations are beyond the ability of many calculators, so might need to be carefully rewritten if the calculator only keeps 10 significant digits, or only manages exponents less than 100.

This shows that daily compounding is very close in effect to continuous compounding. It would take almost 150 years to make a difference of 0.1% in value.

4 0

3 years ago