Explanation:
The journal entry to record the re-issuance of the stock is shown below:
Cash A/c Dr $240,000 (20,000 shares × $12)
Retained earnings A/c Dr $80,000
To Treasury stock $320,000
(Being the re-issuance of the stock is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
For treasury stock
= 20,000 shares × ($16 per share - $12 per share)
= $80,000
So as we can see the retained earnings is decreased by $80,000
The implicit interest based on the information given is $165.
<h3>How to calculate the interest?</h3>
It should be noted that the implicit interest is calculated as:
= Inventory worth × Discount rate
= $16500 × 1%
= $165
Therefore, the implicit interest based on the information given is $165.
Learn more about interest on:
brainly.com/question/24080432
#SPJ1
Answer:
A decrease in cash flows from financing activities
Explanation:
When cash dividend is paid,
It is an outflow of cash as paid, therefore it will decrease the cash flows.
Further dividend is paid to equity, or preference capital raised for business, which is a financing activity.
Therefore, a cash dividend paid to shareholders will result in decrease in cash flow from financing activities.
Whereas cash dividend received is investing activity.
Final Answer
A decrease in cash flows from financing activities.
Answer:
so childhood, is when your learning everything, up to the point where your're an adult, so basically, you're learning, to eat, walk, speak, and basically the important stuff, and an adult is always busy, no matter what, they are always busy, in some way, and don't have much time to make friends like kids do
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
