Answer: a. Western Power must comply with the Williams Act.
Explanation: The Williams Act was passed into law in 1968 and is a federal defining the rules of acquisitions and tender offers in response to hostile attempts at takeovers from corporate raiders who make cash tender offers for stocks they owned. These offers often destroy value since they force stockholders to tender stocks on a shortened timetable and as such, the Williams Act also includes time constraints specifying the number of days to make a decision and also the least amount of time such cash offers may be open. In accordance with the Act, Western Power must follow the tenets stipulated within the Act.
The answer is true because activity is important and shouldn't be discouraged.
Answer:
situational restraints
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this scenario is illustrating situational restraints. These are factors that act as barriers preventing certain behaviors or performances. Which is the case since the company wants and needs a training program but they do not have the personnel or the money to hire professional IT trainers. Therefore placing a barrier on the knowledge and skills that are needed from the training program.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Option B. Treasury Stock for $1,200
Explanation:
The reason is that when 1,000 shares which has $2 par value and were issued at $10 per share, the journal entry was:
Dr Cash Account $10,000
Cr Common Stock $2,000
Cr Paid In Capital $8,000
But when 100 shares were repurchased at $12 per share, then the accounting treatment would be
Dr Treasury Stock $1,200
Cr Cash Account $1,200
So the correct option is option B.
Answer:
traded on information that was not available to the public.
Explanation:
Brianna, a salesperson for Cosmetics Corporation, learns that Cosmetics will increase the dividend it pays to shareholders. Brianna buys 10,000 shares of Cosmetics stock. When the price increases, Brianna sells the shares for a profit. If Brianna is liable for insider trading, it is because she traded on information that was not available to the public.
