Answer:
d. willingness to pay of all buyers in the market.
Explanation:
The demand curve shows the relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity demanded at a particular time.
Therefore, a demand curve reflects:
a. highest price buyers are willing to pay for each quantity.
b.quantity that each buyer will ultimately purchase.
c. value each buyer in the market places on the good.
With this in mind, what the demand curve does not reflect, with these in mind is a willingness to pay of all buyers in the market.
The answer that fits the blank above would be BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT. The balance sheet serves the copy of the liabilities and assets that a company or firm has recorded for a specific period of time. On the other hand, the income statement shows both the profit and loss that the company has. Therefore, it is based on these two that financial managers are able to calculate ratios.
Answer:
Compensation.
Explanation:
According to the information in the question above, it can be said that Carlos is exercising the function of compensation management. His functions are related to the compensation that employees receive for carrying out their work. Compensation managers are also responsible for maintaining the rules of benefits in compliance with management and legality, in addition to developing strategies that assist in retaining and hiring employees and all types of data and information on compensation in the organization.
Transnet SOC Ltd is a rail, port, and pipeline company in Johannesburg.
Price: This company is a price maker, therefore, in terms of price, Transnet perfect compitetor is a price taker.
Output: Transnet has the ability to decide the quantity of their output and they have many competitors on this one.
<span>Profit: Transnet might be able to increase their profit but in a competition it would be hard because customers might switch to the competitor. </span>
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
