Answer:
The solution shows that a rate of return of 10% which provides an annuity factor of 4.868 generates an NPV which is equal to zero. Thus, our IRR or internal rate of return is 10%.
Explanation:
The IRR or internal rate of return is the rate at which NPV or Net Present Value of the investment becomes zero. We are provided with the initial outlay for the project and the annual cash inflows along with time period. Using the annuity factors given below, we need to find out the factor which makes the NPV zero. The NPV is calculated as follows,
NPV = Present Value of Cash Inflows - Initial Outlay
We can try out each annuity factor and see what NPV is generates.
1. 6% rate (Annuity factor = 5.582)
NPV = (30000 * 5.582) - 146040
NPV = $21420
2. 8% rate (Annuity factor = 5.206)
NPV = (30000 * 5.206) - 146040
NPV = $10140
3. 10% rate (Annuity factor = 4.868)
NPV = (30000 * 4.868) - 146040
NPV = $0
So, from the above solution we can see that a rate of return of 10% which provides an annuity factor of 4.868 generates an NPV which is equal to zero. Thus, our IRR or internal rate of return is 10%
Answer:
$195,488.6
Explanation:
The computation of the amount at the end of the 22 years is shown below
The Amount at the end of 1st 11 years is
= Principal × (1 + interest rate)^number of years
= $19,750 × (1 + 0.09)^11
= $50,963.42
Now the amount at the end of the last 11 years is
= $50,963.42 × (1 + 0.13)^11
= $195,488.6
hence, the value at the end of the 22 years is $195,488.60
Answer:
Please refer the reason in detail below
Explanation:
For state and local government entities, additional standards are promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") and for the federal government, additional standards are promulgated by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board ("FASAB").
GASB considers budgetary comparisons as an important part of the basic financial statements and financial reporting and therefore include budgetary comparisons in their concept statements
Answer:
$940,000
Explanation:
The computation of the general and administrative expense is shown below:
= Legal and audit fees + rent for office space × basis
= $580,000 + $720,000 × 50%
= $580,000 + $360,000
= $940,000
In order to find out the general and administrative expense we simply added the legal & audit fees and the rent for office space so that the correct amount could arrive
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the 
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B
