Answer:
Breaking this down.
Step-by-step explanation:
SO basically 50mg each aspiring = 12.5
so? 12.5x4=50mg so he can take up to 4 aspirins per day.
Answer:
With a 0.01 significance level and samples of 50 and 40 cofee drinkers, there is enough statistical evidence to state that the mean daily consumption of regular-coffee drinkers is less than that of decaffeinated-coffee drinkers.
The test is a one-tailed test.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this problem, we run a hypothesis test about the difference of population means.

The appropriate hypothesis system for this situation is:

Difference of means in the null hypothesis is:


![$$The calculated statistic is Z_c=\frac{[(4.35-5.84)-0]}{\sqrt{\frac{1.20^2}{50}+\frac{1.36^2}{40}}}=-5.43926\\p-value = P(Z \leq Z_c)=0.0000\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%24%24The%20calculated%20statistic%20is%20Z_c%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5B%284.35-5.84%29-0%5D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B1.20%5E2%7D%7B50%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B1.36%5E2%7D%7B40%7D%7D%7D%3D-5.43926%5C%5Cp-value%20%3D%20P%28Z%20%5Cleq%20Z_c%29%3D0.0000%5C%5C%5C%5C)
Since, the calculated statistic
is less than critical
, the null hypothesis should be rejected. There is enough statistical evidence to state that the mean daily consumption of regular-coffee drinkers is less than that of decaffeinated-coffee drinkers.
SOH-CAH-TOA
sin Q = <u>Opposite</u> = <u>26</u>
hypotenuse x
sin 54 = <u>26</u>
x
x sin 54 = 26
<u>x sin 54</u> = <u> 26 </u>
sin 54 sin 54
x = <u> 26 </u> = 32.1378 ≈ 32.1 feet
sin 54
Answer:
missing angle = 70 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
180 -120 =60, because supplemenatery angles add up to 180 degrees.
sum of all angles of a triangle = 180. so 180-60-50=70 degrees