Answer:
invoice price? retailers? dealers cost?
Step-by-step explanation:
i dont know if this is worded correctly for me to understand i-
Answer:
192
Step-by-step explanation:
both triangles are 12 in and the square is 168
so 12+12+168= 192in
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
This explanation mostly depends on what you're learning right now. The first way would be to convert this matrix to a system of equations like this.
g + t + k = 90
g + 2t - k = 55
-g - t + 3k = 30
Then you solve using normal methods of substitution or elimination. It seems to me that elimination is the quickest method.
g + t + k = 90
-g - t + 3k = 30
____________
0 + 0 + 4k = 120
4k = 120
k = 30
No you can plug this into the first two equations
g + t + (30) = 90
g + t = 60
and
g + 2t - (30) = 55
g + 2t = 85
now use elimination again by multiplying the first equation by -1
g + 2t = 85
-g - t = -60
_________
0 + t = 25
t = 25
Now plug those both back into one of the equations. I'll just do the first one.
g + (25) + (30) = 90
g = 35
Therefore, we know that Ted spent the least amount of time on the computer.
The second method is using matrix reduction and getting the matrix in the row echelon form, therefore solving using the gauss jordan method. If you would like me to go through this instead, please leave a comment.
Answer:
Tyra.
note that the salary for only one car is less at dealership B, but significantly more when you get to 10 cars. that indicates that the base salary is less, but the commissions are higher.
Answer:
n = 19.89694
Step-by-step explanation:
You can work the problem using decimal numbers. There is no need to convert everything to integers. Trying to do so just gets you in trouble.
Subtract 2.2 from both sides:
-1.398 -2.200 = n/-5.53
-3.598 = n/-5.53
Now, multiply both sides by -5.53:
(-5.53)(-3.598) = n = 19.89694
_____
The one rule that cannot be violated in algebra is that <em>you must do the same thing to both sides of the equation</em>.
_____
Your "solution" so far has a couple of errors. The first is that you have apparently multiplied all of the numbers by 1000. Unfortunately, when you multiply a denominator by 1000, it is the same as dividing by 1000. So, you have multiplied the left side by 1000, multiplied one term on the right by 1000 and divided another term on the right by 1000. This turns the equation into something different than what you started with, and will give a wrong answer.
The second error is that you have subtracted 2200 only from the right side. This, too, will turn the equation into something different than what you started with, and will give a wrong answer.
