Answer: continuance commitment
Explanation:
The above scenario explains a continuance commitment. This occurs when a worker remains with a particular organization after he or she looks at both the benefits and costs of leaving and sees that the cost of leaving the organization outweighs the benefits.
In this case, even though Matrice has had several recruiters offering interviews for possible positions at different companies, he believes that he should stay as a result of the medical insurance benefits that he gets. This is thus referred to as continuance commitment.
Answer:
$659,277
Explanation:
The computation of the manufacturing labor dollars per year over the three year period of performance is shown below:
For 3 year it is
= 3 × 1,800 hours × $31
= $167,400
For 4.5 years, it is
= 4.5 × 1,800 hours × $31 × 1.025
= $257,377.50
Foe 4 years, it is
= 4 × 1,800 hours × $31 × 1.025 × 1.025
= $254,499.50
So, the manufacturing labor dollars per year is
= $167,400 + $257,377.50 + $254,499.50
= $659,277
Answer: $1,350
Explanation:
The insurance is for 2 years but has to be apportioned monthly on account of the Accrual basis in Accounting where expenses will only be recognized when they are incurred.
The expense to be recorded for the first month will therefore be:
= 32,400 / 24 months
= $1,350
Answer:
See explanation below foe answer.
Explanation:
Resource partitioning is a term that refers to the division of resources that are limited by species in order to avoid competition in an ecological niche. In an environment where organisms are in constant competition for limited resources, there arises the need for the organisms and different species to find ways in which to coexist with one another.
An example of Resource Partitioning be seen when two species of hummingbirds in a tropical rainforest, each using flower nectar as their main source of food. But, individuals of the same species can compete with each other also.
Answer: A) need not disclose that fact to the clients
Explanation: An investment adviser representative need not disclose the fact that he/she uses third-party research to formulate portfolio to the clients and the reason is this: It is not necessary to disclose what sources an investment adviser representative uses as the basis for portfolio recommendations, and thus is never in violation of his fiduciary responsibility. However, if the third-party research used is to be distributed to his clients, then, proper attribution is required.
