Yes it was reasonable. I say it is resonable because if you multiply 44 times 25 it is 1,100 so the estimate was close enough
No because 4 square equals 2 square and since 3 isn't a perfect number, it would be 2 square times 3 square, which equals 6 square.
Point slope from would be 12x-y+26=0.
Black is the equation, 12x-y+26=0.
- Orange is <em>y-14=12(x+1)</em>
- Blue is <em>y-14=12(x-1)</em>
- Red is <em>y+14=12(x-1)</em>
- Green is <em>y-14=-12(x+1)</em>
Answer:
no. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
This much of Josh's working is correct:
x^2-6x=7
x^2-6x+9=7+9
(x-3)^2=16
At this point Josh apparently overlooked the fact that he needed to take the square root of both sides of the equation. Had he done that, he would have ...
x -3 = ±4
x = 3+4 . . . or . . . 3 -4
x = 7 or -1
_____
Josh reported values of x that would match ...
x -3 = ±16
He <em>violated the equal sign</em> by taking the square root on the left, and multiplying by ±1 on the right. Doing different operations on the two sides of the equation will mean the value of x is changed to something other than what you're looking for.
Answer:
0.01010
Step-by-step explanation:
The decimal equivalent is ...

Rounded to 4 significant figures, it is ...
0.01010