A reflection about the x axis, about y=0, is the mapping (x',y')=(x,-y) so
A dilation of 2 is the mapping (x'',y'')=(2x', 2y')
So
We can rewrite that without the primes and combine the powers of 2.
Let's graph these and see if we're close,
Plot y= (1/4)^x, y= - (1/4)^{x}, y = - 2^{1-x}
Do you have a photo of the diagram ?
G=24+w
r=2w
g+w+r=124
Substitute the values to get 24+w+w+2w=124
Simplifies to 4w=100. Therefore, Wayne has 25. Greg has 24 more than Wayne, so he has 49. Ronald would have 50.
Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Note that in △RST and △UVW
- m∠T=180°-m∠R-m∠S;
- m∠W=180°-m∠U-m∠V.
Since ∠R≅∠U and ∠S≅∠V, then ∠T≅∠W.
In ΔRST and ΔUVW:
- ∠S≅∠V (given);
- ∠T≅∠W (proved);
- ST≅VW (given).
ASA theorem that states that if two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
By ASA theorem ΔRST≅ΔUVW.
