1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mojhsa [17]
3 years ago
12

What is the 7th term of the sequence 3,12,48,192

Mathematics
1 answer:
Sedbober [7]3 years ago
8 0
If you look at this sequence, every term of this sequence is being multiplied by 4.

3 x 4 = 12
12 x 4 = 48
48 x 4 = 192
192 x 4= 768
768 x 4 = 3072
3072 x 4 = 12288

So the 7th term of this sequence is 12288.
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
Claudia is making a candle by pouring melted wax into a mold in the shape of a cylinder. The radius of the cylinder’s base is 4
Sati [7]

The formula of a cylinder is 2πr (r+h)

2π4 (4+9)

8π (13)

25.13 (13)

326.73

Cubes: area = a^3

3x3x3 = 27

326.73 / 27 = 12.1

Claudia would need to buy 13 wax cubes to fil the candle.

hope this helps k12 students :)

3 0
1 year ago
Can someone answer these pls
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

Exponential

Step-by-step explanation:

The y values are going up by a factor of 2 as x increases.

3 0
3 years ago
Javier jogs 3/4 of a mile in 8/1/2 minutes.
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

11 1/3 minutes per mile.

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 miles jogged in 8 1/2 minutes.

So 1 mile jogged in: 8 1/2 divided by 3/4 = 8 1/2 x 4/3  = (17 x 4) / (2 x 3) = 11 1/3 minutes per mile

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer this question ASAP! 25 points
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

(2p + r + 7) × (p + 9)

Step-by-step explanation:

Length: 2p + r + 7

Width: p + 9

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is mean median mode rang of 34,22,35,17,20,17,24,37,29,10
    6·1 answer
  • What is the product? (5r + 2)(3r − 4)
    8·1 answer
  • For every $2 that Pam saves, her brother saves $5. If her brother has $60 more, how much does Pam have
    12·2 answers
  • Which table shows a proportional relationship between miles traveled and gas used?
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP 20 points
    7·1 answer
  • Help In math pls this a slope problem
    10·1 answer
  • Pls help me i need help with this
    13·1 answer
  • In a family, each brother has as many sisters as broth, but
    15·1 answer
  • What is the area of the parallelogram
    8·2 answers
  • How many solutions does this system show???
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!