Answer:
D) foreign policy leader.
Explanation:
Either D or B)..... Chief Executive.
Commander in Chief.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer:
Has not developed an understanding of the cues to performance of these pragmatic skills.
Explanation:
In this context, Understanding cues to performance refers to humans' ability to observe the situation around us, and deliver the most appropriate technique that help us benefit from the situation.
From the excerpt, we know that John has a very good pragmatic skills in general. But this test is most likely taken under a structured situation that does not represent the actual real life. So, when John actually encountered it in his social life, he does not understand when is the proper time to actually use the skill.
Answer:
70 to 75 percent
Explanation:
Genetic modification (GM) is the area of biotechnology which concerns itself with the manipulation of the genetic material in living organisms, enabling them to perform specific functions. GM crops can mitigate several current challenges in commercial agriculture
Agricultural giant Mosanto is a leader in technology and also famous for engineering food and pesticides. Together, that may mean more genetically modified food in grocery stores, with a higher risk of pesticide residue.
Answer:
Cognitive-behavior therapy.
Explanation:
CBT is a goal-oriented psychotherapy treatment that works with practical approaches to problem solving. The goal is to change thinking or behavioral reactions to some difficulties, therefore, changing the way they feel and think. As the exercise describes, they are taught to attribute their compulsive urges to abnormal brain functioning. Instead of giving in to an urge, they participated in an alternative activity that engaged other parts of the brain.
