A is the correct answer.
The 1st Amendment, broadly, prohibits B-D.
Politicians, instead, go on Cable news shows and try to "spin" the stories to get the public to see their side of the issue. They might explain their side and why or they might spit out the party line.
the first one and third one sis
The description was not given. To help you answer this question, we will explain what insider threats and their indicators are. Insider threat refers to someone who has classified information about the United States government, and who uses such knowledge to harm the government. Indicators of threats could be
- Information Transmittal and
- Other suspicious behaviors
As shown in the foregoing, recruitment which involves unreported activities and contact with suspicious elements is an indicator of an insider threat.
Information collection from unauthorized sources is a sign of a threat.
Information transmittal involves sending information to and through unauthorized sources. This is also an indication of an insider threat.
With this understanding, check the description and determine if there are any of the above-mentioned insider threat indicators.
If you do not find any, the answer will be 0.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/25164014
D because I would rather have both partners depend on each other for support than someone who is impatient or just is too focused on themdelbed to care about me.
<span>A forensic psychologist would most likely not to do is to write legislation to regulate the practice of psychology in the courts. Forensic psychologist must be licensed psychologists to conduct specific tests and be acknowledged with the interpretation of their result to legal matters. They mostly study the state of the mind of the criminal defendants, family law of violence such as child abuse, and check whether it passes the civil law, research of social science</span> and other mind related events.
