<span>The statement which states that peer pressure can happen at any time, can be positive or negative and can be avoided if people are equipped with the right skills is true. Peer pressure is that influence that come from others which makes you to consider doing things you wouldn't have think of doing on your own. Peer pressure can be negative or positive and may involve making decisions concerning fashion choice, alcohol or drug involvement, having a boy/girl friend, academic performance, group of friends to move with, etc. Saying 'no' to negative peer pressure becomes easier when one is comfortable with oneself.</span><span />
Answer:
C
Explanation:
wikipedia says: "The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house or House of Representatives, but required the upper house or Senate to be weighted equally among the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house."
one of the most important features of the U.S constitution is its durability or its rigidity
A persons record has alot to do with it. They normally consider the severity of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. Some crimes put a person ineligible for bail. A persons record is another consideration. Someone who has a long record may be subject to bigger bail amounts, if any at all. Another thing, if a problematic person has tendencies for being late to court, or not showing up at all. Judges have been know to look at a persons family life and employment status. A persons reputation can really count. I hope this has given you enough information.
La respuesta correcta es la siguiente.
¿Qué ventajas y desventajas traería consigo la aplicación completa de los pactos o acuerdos internacionales en situaciones de emergencia nacional como la que estamos viviendo?
Veamos primero las ventajas. Los pactos internacionales son firmados para que los países participantes actúen en correspondencia con los lineamientos que fueron acordados. Por eso hay negociaciones que contemplan los pro y los contra de las decisiones que se van a tomar.
Una ventaja sería homologar criterios de aplicación de una medida para que todas las naciones respondieran de manera similar para estar en armonía con las otras naciones.
La gran desventaja es que cada país es diferente. Hay países de primer mundo que tiene los recursos financieros para enfrentar una situación de emergencia con cierta facilidad. Pero los países del tercer mundo o desarrollados no cuentan con el dinero para brindar apoyos ni respuesta eficiente a sus ciudadanos. Es por esos que deben respetarse las circunstancias propias de cada país.
