Answer:
$45,473
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, we can use this method to solve the problem.
Solution:
$42,000 + $4,960 – $1,100 – ($1,830 – $1,380) + ($381 – $318)
= $46,960- $,1,100-$450-$63
=$45,473
As our answer
If increased government spending spurs a short-run expansion. The statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
<h3>What is aggregate supply?</h3>
Aggregate supply can be defined as the overall amount of goods and service that a firm intend to produce and supply at a point in time or at a particular period of time.
If an increase in government spending lead to short run expansion this means that there will be shift in aggregate supply of goods and service as aggregate supply will tend to shift to the left.
Therefore the statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
Learn more about aggregate supply here:brainly.com/question/19802257
#SPJ1
The correct answer is B.
The interviewer will be taking notes with recommendations for the next person in the process, since the interviewer won't be the sole person making the rejection/acceptance decision.
Answer:
C. Researcher
Explanation:
The PHS or Public Health Service regulations established specific rules created in order to increase accountability, implement transparency, and even increase regulatory compliance and management of financial conflicts of interest which require researcher party to disclose significant financial conflicts of interest
