Answer:
Fifth-grade detective Mickey Rangel feels like a stuck pig at a barbecue when Mrs. Abrego calls him down to her office; what could he be on the hot seat for? When Mrs. A starts talking about the rash of graffiti that has recently tarnished the school, Mickey frantically rushes to protest his innocence. Mrs. A talks him down; she knows he didn’t do it, but maybe he can figure out who did. Mickey dubs this miscreant the Mischievous Marker and finds a major clue in the latest graffiti message: “Our Principle’s no ‘pal’ of nobodies!” Top-notch speller Mickey notices the problems right away. At lunch that day, when Mickey sees his lifelong archnemesis, Bucho, giving Mickey’s twin brother, Ricky, a hard time, he imagines how sweet it would be if he could prove that the troublemaker Bucho was the Magic Marker Mischief Maker. And if not him, then who? Mickey will need to question more persons of interest and nail down the timeline to crack the case. The brief, fast-moving mystery appears first in English, then Spanish, in Villarroel’s translation. Saldaña's prose is peppy, and his mystery, while quickly solved, hammers home a solid grammar lesson as a bonus.
Though he’s no teacher’s pet, Mickey’s smarts make him a welcome protagonist.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
Independent:Tickets,Shopping list,weight,Hiking,Mushrooms in the bridge,Number of trophies
Dependent:Money,Shopping bas,price of customer's order,snacks,mushroom tarts, shelves on the case
Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
Answer:
c = 21
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>**I assume that side WX in my diagram (attached as an image below) is the value of C that we're looking for. ALSO, the sizes and lengths of the parallelograms are NOT to scale.**</u>
If two parallelograms are similar, that means the lengths of the corresponding sides have EQUAL ratios.
PL corresponds with WZ. To get from 15 to 45, you would multiply 15 by 3, so the ratio of the legnths of the corresponding sides between these two parallelograms is 1:3.
With that in mind, we can apply this ratio to find WX.
We know that AP has a length of 7, so we will multiply that by 3, getting a value of 21, and 7:21 ratio is the same as 1:3.
c = 21
Hope this helps (●'◡'●)
