The interpretation of the slope in the context of the problem is: For every hour the electrician works, her pay will increase $28.
<h3>How to Interpret the Slope of a Function?</h3>
The slope of any function is the unit rate or average rate of change of the given function for that situation.
Given the function, E(x) = 130 + 28x, where:
E(x) is the amount an electrician charges per job
130 is the flat rate service which is the starting value or y-intercept
28 is the unit rate or slope, which is the fee charged per hour by the electrician to complete a job.
Thus, the interpretation of the slope in the context of the problem is: For every hour the electrician works, her pay will increase $28.
Learn more about slope on:
brainly.com/question/24502219
#SPJ1
Answer:
answer is 13 plus 26 is equal to 39
Answer:
64 is the sum of the numbers
58 + 6 = 64
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST
Well this is simple a calculator type problem...but if you are curious as the the algorithm used by simple calculators and such...
They use a Newtonian approximation until it surpasses the precision level of the calculator or computer program..
A newtonian approximation is an interative process that gets closer and closer to the actual answer to any mathematical problem...it is of the form:
x-(f(x)/(df/dx))
In a square root problem you wish to know:
x=√n where x is the root and n is the number
x^2=n
x^2-n=0
So f(x)=x^2-n and df/dx=2x so using the definition of the newton approximation you have:
x-((x^2-n)/(2x)) which simplifies further to:
(2x^2-x^2+n)/(2x)
(x^2+n)/(2x), where you can choose any starting value of x that you desire (though convergence to an exact (if possible) solution will be swifter the closer xi is to the actual value x)
In this case the number, n=95.54, so a decent starting value for x would be 10.
Using this initial x in (x^2+95.54)/(2x) will result in the following iterative sequence of x.
10, 9.777, 9.774457, 9.7744565, 9.7744565066299210578124802523397
The calculator result for my calc is: 9.7744565066299210578124802523381
So you see how accurate the newton method is in just a few iterations. :P
