The answer is TRUE
Realism and idealism are divergent <span>schools of thought in international relations </span><span>theory. </span>The development of modern realist theory was as a reaction<span> to a liberal tradition that was labelled by the realists as idealism. Although the idealist themselves do not consider</span><span> their approach as unrealistic, the realists think it is.</span>
Answer:
Option D. After completion of market research, situation analysis, and competitor analysis
Explanation:
The reason is that the company always sets objectives and goals when it analyzes the business environment, the way competitor would react, product demand, etc and all these things come from market research, situation analysis, competitor analysis, position analysis, capability analysis, etc. This gives a clear picture where the organization must head towards. So after completion of these analysis and research, company is able to set goals.
Always remember that the company sets its goals before marketing planning (Option A) and after situation analysis (Option B) because it helps define what number of sales we need which formulates the marketing planning.
Option C is incorrect because strategies are set after the objectives and goals are set because the strategies are always alligned with the objectives and goals.
Option E is incorrect because Goals and Objectives are set always after the SWOT and PESTLE analysis not during these studies.
Here the only only option with broader meaning is option D which also includes the Option A and Option B.
True, because the more variables the better
<span>No, specific performance is not allowed in this case because money damages are available.
In case that a party failed to fulfill the condition that signed on the contract, the court could give 1 of 2 form of punishments.
The first is to forcibly make that party perform the condition (specific performance), the other is to pay back the loss that incurred because of that party fail to fulfill the condition (money damages)</span>
Answer:
The value of the intangible will remain at $350,000
Explanation:
The reason is that the International Accounting Standard IAS-36 says that once the impairment is recognized for the intangible assets it can not be reversed which means that the amount reported would be $350,000. The reason is that it is very rare that the asset gain its value and specially those which are intangible assets. Most of the management in the 1990s-2000 tried to recognize a gain on impairment which was unjustifiable to increase their profits for the period so the standard specifically didn't permitted gain on a previously impaired asset.
