Answer:
The separation of power in a democracy like the U.S prevents us from tyranny because the decisions and solutions presented must be agreed upon by two or more legislations. If not agreed on or deemed as a violation of citizens rights the government has the ability to reject or veto the law.
Explanation:
Tyranny definition is - <em>a cruel and oppressive government or rule, decisions often made by a sole ruler regardless of others opinions.</em>
Answer:
Both
Explanation:
In view of the political and administrative positions that the US Constitution proposed and stabilized, it would be impossible to state that the choices made by the authors of the constitution were based on only one of the concepts mentioned in the question above. The constitution was written taking into account the republicanist ideas that guided the whole principle of the political structure imposed in the country. In addition, the principles of freedom, equality and natural rights were also used to define the socioeconomic relations that the government should maintain and stimulate the American territory.
Nevertheless, the government needed to establish guidelines based solely on the political interests that the authors had, even the definition of slavery within the country underscores those interests, aimed at the economy and agricultural production.
Answer:
it is right
Explanation:
Animals get the nitrogen they need by eating plants or other animals that contain nitrogen. When organisms die, their bodies decompose bringing the nitrogen into soil on land or into ocean water. Bacteria alter the nitrogen into a form that plants are able to use.
Answer:
The argument uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
Explanation:
The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
