Answer:
10th amendment
Explanation:
As the final amendment in the Bill of Rights, the 10th Amendment originally aimed to reassure Anti-Federalists by further defining the balance of power between the national government and those of the individual states
Learning about the government and the roles involved can help stimulate children's minds and inspire them to one day become a politician. If you liked this plz mark it brainliest (you get 3 extra points). Thanks:)
If an area hasn't been made fire safe, The responsible party is ultimately responsible for preventing hot work from taking place before it begins.
“Responsible Person” means a person or entity who manages, controls, or directs the disposition of the entity and the entity's funds and assets, as opposed to a candidate who has little or no authority over the entity's assets. is.
There is a huge amount of case law on this, but basically, if you sign as responsible and the contract defines that the responsible person is responsible for all payments, the guardian or your loved one cannot be a trustee either.
Learn more about responsible parties here
brainly.com/question/15051055
#SPJ4
As the questions states "are," this implies that multiple answers are possible. In that case, all of these would be useful strategies to reduce the stigma against people with psychological disorders.
If people increased their contact with members of this population, they would stop seeing psychological disorders as something far from them and difficult to understand. Moreover, if they increased their education on the subject, they would be less likely to have prejudices or stigma against these people. Finally, increased equality education would allow members of this population to be more included in society, which would most likely decrease the stigma.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
