True because in Shanghai the equilibrium of the bees is much harder than the volume of the wasp in Kosovo
Answer:
A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.
D. self-sufficiency argument.
Explanation:
In the case when there is a race to the bottom scenario so it would be described that the multinational companies that are profit seeking is shifting their production from that countries who have the strong environmental standards to the weak standard countries so that the order would be decreased due to this the profit would increase
In the other case, when the nation is not too much depend on other countries for supplies so this case we called as self-sufficiency argument as they managed themselves rather depending on another
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
According to James Grunig, professor emeritus of public relations at the University of Maryland, the five possible objectives for a communicator are:
• Message Exposure - This refers to situation when the intended people get exposed to the message that is being shared. Here, materials are provided to the mass media by the PR personel.
• Accurate dissemination of message - Messages must be passed across and communicated as clearly as possible without giving out false information or witholding back some information which is vital for the accuracy of the information delivered.
• Acceptance of the message - The message passed must be accepted by the person that's being addressed.
• Attitude change - There must be an attitude change after the message has been delivered as these shows acceptance and products should be purchased.
• Change in overt behavior - Overt behavior is openly seen and hence, there will be change in overt behavior and the goods will be purchased.
Answer:
a. $103,400
Explanation:
As we know that
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory + purchases - ending inventory
And,
Gross profit = Sales revenue - cost of goods sold
Since in the question it is given that
The ending inventory and beginning inventory had been overstated by $11,200 and $6,600 respectively
Since overstatement in the initial inventory raises the cost of the goods sold and decreases by that amount the gross profit & net income
And, overstatement in ending inventory reduced cost of goods sold and raised gross profit & net income by that amount.
So for overstated ending inventory the amount should be deducted and for overstated beginning inventory the condition would be reverse
So, the correct amount is
= incorrect pretax net income + overstatement in beginning inventory - overstatement in ending inventory
= $108,000 + $6,600 - $11,200
= $103,400
Answer:
Tell her that it will take a very long time
Explanation:
