Answer:
D. They result in new situations that are not covered by old laws
Explanation:
Bistro's first banner was a form of a unilateral contract. This means that the banner was a legally enforceable promise between two parties where one party will perform the requirement and the other (Bistro) would pay.
For the given situation, Daisy substantially performed the required task and therefore, Bistro is not allowed to revoke the offer.
Based on the above, the statement that <span>best describes Daisy's and Bistro's rights in this situation is:
</span><span>Bistro cannot revoke the offer because Daisy has substantially performed the requested action.</span>
Answer: 44%
Explanation:
In probability, Independent event is simply an event that doesn't have anything to do with the occurrence or non-occurrence of another event.
From the question, we are informed that likelihood of Company A's stock price rising is 20%, and the likelihood of Company B's stock price rising is 30% and they are both independent.
Therefore, the probability that the stock price of at least one of the companies will rise goes thus:
P(at least one will rise) will be:
= 1 - P(both fall)
= 1 - [(1-0.20) × (1-0.30)]
= 1- (0.8 × 0.7)
= 1 - 0.56
= 0.44
= 44%
Answer:
Question 1 - A parcel of vacant land located at the intersection of two streets used heavily by commuters
The parcel of vacant land could be used for building a house for domestic purposes: to be inhabited by a family or any other group of people, or it could also be used for building a commercial property (for example, a convenience shop).
Because the parcel is located at an intersection where there are many commuters, the market will likely determine that a commercial property would be more profitable, since many commuters means many potential customers.
A house, on the other hand, could not be as profitable, because people tend to dislike living in places where there are many people around.
Answer:
No option is correct:
- A. Larry offers Curly 1 ping-pong ball for 1/4 of a hat.
- B. Curly offers Larry 1 hat for 3 ping-pong balls.
- C. Curly offers Larry 1 hat for 4 ping-pong balls.
- D. Larry offers Curly 1 ping-pong ball for 1/3 hat.
In order for Curly to win and Larry lose, Curly must offer 1 hat in exchange for 6 or more ping-pong balls.
- Option A: Larry wins 1 ping-pong ball.
- Option B: Larry wins 2 ping-pong balls.
- Option C: Larry wins 3 ping-pong balls.
- Option D: Larry wins 0.13 of a hat.
Explanation:
Opportunity costs are the benefits lost or extra costs associated to choosing one investment or activity over another alternative.
In this case, Larry can either have 1 hat or 5 ping-pong balls. Curly can have 1 hat or 2 ping-pong balls.
