Hello there,
[]_________________________________________________________[]
First of all this is a easy one! The "Federal Reserve" is considered the bankers' bank because it <span>holds bankers reserves, provides banks with currency and loans, and clears their checks. Therefore cannot be touched by civilians / citizens.
[]_________________________________________________________[]
Hope I was able to help!
[Mark Brainliest] - Certified Correct?</span>
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
Answer:
Yes, because the corporation remains liable to the owner under the contract
Explanation:
The above answer is true because in this case, there is no limit to the assignment of the contractual rights between the two parties, hence this assignment of a contract would be treated as both an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties.
Therefore, while the corporation in this case has delegated its duties and assigned its rights under the contract to the developer by assigning the contract to the developer, the corporation is still considered to be liable to the owner for payment of the purchase price.
And given the fact that the developer is not as creditworthy as the corporation, and thus there is a greater chance that the developer will be unable to pay the purchase price, the owner has the rights under the contract arrangement to contractually compel the corporation to do so.
Union members earn "about 20% more" than non-union members, even after adjusting for factors such as "years of work experience and education level.".
<h3>Who are Union and Non-Union members?</h3>
Workers who band together and use their collective power to have a say in the workplace create a union.
Labour union members can bargain with employers about pay, benefits, workplace health and safety, job training, and other work-related problems from a position of power through their union.
Employee involvement in corporate decision-making through representative organisations is known as non-union employee representation.
The reasons for union workers paid more are-
- Employees that are more productive get paid more - Unions assert that they may bargain for greater salaries for workers.
- In truth, higher pay rates result from employers in unionised organisations being more selective in the hiring process since they must find individuals who can produce more and do so with higher standards.
To know more about the roles of labour union, here
brainly.com/question/15167596
#SPJ4
